DIS4ME DIS4ME Homepage | DESERTLINKS Homepage | © DESERTLINKS 2004
English-EN | Español-ES | Italiano-I | Ελληνικά-GR | Portuguese-PT
Desertification Indicator System for Mediterranean Europe


1. Definition

Name

EFFECTIVE PRECIPITATION

Brief definition

The amount of rainfall that is used by the vegetation and the amount of rainfall that becomes runoff

Unit of measure

mm and ratio

2. Position within the logical framework DPSIR

Type of Indicator

D, P, S, I and R

3. Target and political pertinence

Objective

To express water availability

Importance with respect to desertification

Key indicators for all aspects of desertification

International Conventions and agreements

Secondary objectives of the indicator

4. Methodological description and basic definitions

Definitions and basic concepts

For the index: measured precipitation and runoff are divided by the catchment area to give a depth in mm. Values can be divided by the annual rainfall to give a ratio. In the second case this is in effect the runoff coefficient.
This parameter has been related to the annual precipitation, soil profile development, ecology and sediment yield and erosion. It can be used to look at changes in evaporation performance by the vegetation.

Benchmarks Indication of the values/ranges of value

Sudden increases or decreases are indicative of change. Interpretation of the
index is climate dependent, with thresholds at about 350 to 400 mm.

Methods of measurement

Can use published rainfall and river discharge data.

The Effective Precipitation (the amount of precipitation that eventually becomes runoff) is more or less equivalent to the runoff co-efficient. It has long been used as a climate index by Jenny who related it to the different ecosystems in the USA and to the type of soil. For example calcium carbonate begins to accumulate in the soil when the EPI is below about 500 mm and water soluble salts at say 300 mm. It has been related by Musgrave (1954) to the sediment collected in lakes and by Anderson (various papers between 1948 and 1960) to the sediment yield of American rivers.

The EPI index can be used at a regional and continental scale to compare sites but within any region allowance must be made for the geology. The EPI is at a maximum for areas with about 350 to 500 mm and this is the region in which erosion is at a maximum (Schumm and Lichty). Above these values, rainfall causes more vegetation to grow. This evaporates more water so that there is relatively less runoff and also less erosion. Desertification in these areas will cause more runoff.
In the areas with less than 350 to 500 mm, the opposite might happen, as mentioned above. During wet years, there will be more vegetation and the effective precipitation in the summer will drop. During dry years, on the other hand there will be less vegetation so that there will be more runoff.

To address this problem, the EPI should be interpreted in combination with the precipitation data , i.e. related to change in the amount of rainfall. It can also be used for monitoring temporal changes.

Limits of the indicator

Interpretations require understanding of the hydrological cycle when different sites are compared.

Linkages with other indicators

Related to Soil erosion, sediment yield and actual evapotranspiration.

5. Evaluation of data needs and availability

Data required to calculate the indicator

Data readily available.

Data sources

Availability of data from national and international sources

Availability of data from national and international sources

6. Institutions that have participated in developing the indicator

Main institutions responsible

3D-EC

Other contributing organizations

7. Additional information

Bibliography

Other references

see also US Geological survey data

Contacts Name and address

Anton Imeson
3DE@hetnet.nl