DIS4ME DIS4ME Homepage | DESERTLINKS Homepage | © DESERTLINKS 2004
English-EN | Español-ES | Italiano-I | Ελληνικά-GR | Portuguese-PT
Desertification Indicator System for Mediterranean Europe


1. Definition

Name EROSION RISK (RDI)
Brief definition A quantitative estimate of the long term average rate of land erosion at a site of interest.
Unit of measure Tonnes Ha-¹ year-¹
Spatial scale  
Temporal scale  

2. Position within the logical framework DPSIR

Type of Indicator State

3. Target and political pertinence

Objective To provide a measure of the expected rate of water erosion for a given small area (generally 1 km²). The PESERA/RDI model is used to make the estimate.
Importance with respect to desertification Overland flow runoff occurs where the intensity and duration of rainstorms exceeds the capacity of the soil to infiltrate the rain. The volume of runoff, combined with the topography and soil strength (erodibility) determine the volume eroded during a storm, and the erosion risk is the cumulative effect of storms over a period. Water erosion is widely considered to be the most serious desertification hazard in Europe.
International Conventions and agreements The UNCCD emphasizes that combating desertification must be tackled within the general framework of actions to promote sustainable development.
Secondary objectives of the indicator As well as indicating the general level of erosion expected, the erosion risk can be used to allocate resources for mitigation or further research. It can also be used to investigate the expected impact of land use or climate change scenarios.

4. Methodological description and basic definitions

Definitions and basic concepts The PESERA/RDI model is used to make a physically based estimate of the erosion risk, combining three components which are multiplied together:
  1. Erosivity, derived from climate and soil properties, determines the power of the runoff to transport sediment
  2. Topographic index, estimated from local relief (standard deviation of heights within a 1 km radius)
  3. Soil erodibility, estimated from soil characteristics, primarily texture.
Benchmarks Indication of the values/ranges of value Erosion risk normally takes values between 0.1 and 100 T Ha-¹ yr-¹. Replacement of organic topsoil may take place at up to 5 T Ha-¹ yr-¹, but replacement of mineral soil by weathering generally occurs at 1 T Ha-¹ yr-¹ or less, so that values of more than 2-5 T Ha-¹yr-¹ generally lead to progressive loss of soil and associated fertility.
Methods of measurement The index is calculated within the PESERA/RDI model. Estimates may be compared with experimental field plot data and with more detailed models such as WEPP or LISEM.
Limits of the indicator The indicator is applicable only to erosion by running water. It contains routines for estimating loss under snow and freezing conditions.
Linkages with other indicators Erosivity (RDI), Runoff Threshold (RDI)

5. Evaluation of data needs and availability

Data required to calculate the indicator The main data sets required are as follows. Data should be interpolated to a regular grid, generally at 250-1000m.
  1. Daily rainfall for >=10 years.
  2. Monthly means for temperature and potential evapotranspiration
  3. Digital Elevation Model
  4. Soils map (European Soils Data Base or better)
  5. Land use (e.g. CORINE), or monthly remotely-sensed land cover
Data sources Necessary data are usually available and accessible to researchers, but meteorological data may be expensive.
Availability of data from national and international sources Data can be obtained from various regional, national or international institutions involved in the collection and the analysis of meteorological and soils data. The 90 m SRTM DEM is available from the EROS data centre free of charge.

6. Institutions that have participated in developing the indicator

Main institutions responsible University of Leeds
Other contributing organizations Catholic University of Leuven, Agricultural Univ of Athens, ISRIC Wageningen, CSIC/EEZA Almeria, INRA Orleans, Universities of Basilicata, Lisbon and Murcia.

7. Additional information

Bibliography Kosmas, C., Kirkby, M. and Geeson, N. 1999. Manual on: Key indicators of desertification and mapping environmentally sensitive areas to desertification. European Commission, Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, EUR 18882, 87
Other references Kirkby, M.J., Y. Le Bissonais, T.J. Coulthard, J. Daroussin and M.L. McMahon, 2000. The development of Land Quality Indicators for Soil Degradation by Water Erosion. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 81, 125-36

Kirkby, M.J., Jones, R.J.A., Irvine, B., Gobin, A, Govers, G., Cerdan, O., Van Rompaey, A.J.J., Le Bissonnais, Y., Daroussin, J., King, D., Montanarella, L., Grimm, M., Vieillefont, V., Puigdefabregas, J., Boer, M., Kosmas, C., Yassoglou, N., Tsara, M., Mantel, S., Van Lynden, 2004. G. Pan-European Soil Erosion Risk Assessment: The PESERA Map, Version 1 October 2003. Explanation of Special Publication Ispra 2004 No.73 (S.P.I.04.73). European Soil Bureau Research Report No.16, EUR 21176, 18pp. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.

Contacts Name and address Mike Kirkby, School of Geography, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK mike@geog.leeds.ac.uk