|
1. Definition
|
Name
|
PARALLEL
EMPLOYMENT
|
|
Brief
definition
|
The
percentage of Off-farm Income as a percentage of the
Total Family Income (Family Farm Income plus Off-Farm
Income)
|
|
Unit of measure
|
%
|
2.
Position within the logical framework DPSIR
|
Type
of Indicator
|
Driving
Force
|
3.
Target and political pertinence
|
Objective
|
The
indicator contributes to the definition of the socio-economic
context of the area affected by desertification.
|
|
Importance
with respect to desertification
|
There
is a strong interdependence between poverty and degradation
of natural resources. Poverty is a multidimensional
phenomenon, characterized by a multitude of factors
such as a deficiency in the enjoyment of human rights,
a lack of sufficient income, a lack of power (i.e.
lack of information, knowledge, participation in the
political decision process), a lack of social integration
and a lack of access to social services. The integration
of the family members in the external labour market
can be seen as a tool to avoid this negative interdependence
in marginal areas. Many studies conducted in poverty-stricken
rural areas show that agricultural activity, when
it is the only source of income for the family, can
accentuate the environmental degradation already present
in these areas, by irreversibly exploiting the land.
The off-farm labour opportunities provide the possibility
of remaining on the land with better guarantees for
the control of the territory in terms of resource
preservation.
|
|
International
Conventions and agreements
|
The
UNCCD emphasized the importance of the measures to
improve the economic environment with a view to eradicating
poverty, increasing incomes and employment opportunities,
especially for the poorest members of the community.
|
|
Secondary
objectives of the indicator
|
This
indicator, at both national and sub national levels,
represents a fundamental indicator for decision- makers.
The economic well-being of the household is clearly
more dependent on what is happening to the economy
in general than by the situation in agriculture, and
supporting agriculture could be a particularly ineffective
way of targeting these households.
|
4.
Methodological description and basic definitions
|
Definitions
and basic concepts
|
Off-farm
income includes both earned and unearned sources,
such as other employment (employment and self-employment),
investments, pensions and social payments
Family
Farm Income (FFI) is the residual remaining to the
farmer and the other unpaid labour of the household
after the deduction of interest payments, rent payments
and the cost of remunerating paid hired labour. It
represents the reward to the farmer and his/her family
for the use of their own land, own capital and personal
labour in agricultural activity on the farm.
|
|
Benchmarks
Indication of the values/ranges of value
|
I°
range: < Local Mean -St. Dev.
II° range: >Local Mean - St. Dev. < Local Mean
III° range: > Local Mean < Local Mean + St.
Dev.
IV° range: > Local Mean + St. Dev
|
|
Methods
of measurement
|
The
ratio between Off-Farm Income and the Total Family
Income, sum of Family Farm Income plus Off-Farm Income
Following
the EU FADN explanatory note:
Family
Farm Income (FFI) corresponds to farm net value-added,
less other real costs in the accounting year: interest
and financial charges, wages and social security costs
paid and rent. The Farm Net Value-Added (FNVA) is
the total output less intermediate consumption and
depreciation, adjusted to take account of taxes, grants
and subsidies linked to production. The FNVA is an
indicator of the economic performance of the holding.
It remunerates family and hired labour, own and borrowed
capital and the management of the holding.
|
|
Limits
of the indicator
|
The
impact of non-farm income is not uniform across the
enterprise types. In particular, dairy farming is
relatively labour-demanding and exacting in time requirements,
restricting the capacity for off-farm activity, so
that the total income of farm households may be low,
even where farming incomes are relatively high. Conversely
the total incomes of large crop farms are often high
because other activities are carried out in parallel,
though this form of farming may not be particularly
profitable (Hill, B., 2000).
|
|
Linkages
with other indicators
|
EU
production subsidies, Gross Margin
|
5.
Evaluation of data needs and availability
|
Data
required to calculate the indicator
|
Off-Farm
Income, Family Farm Income
|
|
Data
sources
|
EUROSTAT,
Direct Inquiry
|
|
Availability of data
from national and international sources
|
FADN, EUROSTAT
|
6.
Institutions that have participated in developing the indicator
|
Main
institutions responsible
|
University
of Basilicata, Italy
|
|
Other
contributing organizations
|
Universities
of Athens, Lisbon, Murcia, Basilicata
|
7.
Additional information
|
Bibliography
|
Quaranta,
G. - Salvia, R. (2000): Peasant Agriculture and part-time
farming: use of resources and landscape effects in
a rural area of Southern Italy, Medit n° 1
|
|
Other
references
|
Hill,
B. (2000): Agricultural Incomes and the CAP
|
|
Contacts
Name and address
|
University
of Basilicata
Prof Giovanni Quaranta
email: quaranta@unibas.it
|
|