|
1. Definition
| Name |
SOIL
TEXTURE |
| Brief
definition |
Soil texture is the relative
proportion of sand, silt, and clay in a soil. Sand is the
2.0 to 0.05 mm soil fraction, and according to the USDA system
is subdivided into five classes (very coarse sand 2.0-1.0
mm, coarse sand 1.0-0.5 mm, medium sand 0.5-0.25 mm, fine
sand 0.25-0.1 mm, and very fine sand 0.1-0.05 mm). Silt is
the 0.05 to 0.002 mm soil fraction, and clay is the soil fraction
which has diameter less than 0.002 mm. Texture changes slowly
with time.
 |
Soil
containing high amounts of swelling clay favouring the
formation of wide and deep cracks during the dry period
(photo by C. Kosmas) |
|
| Unit of measure |
None |
2. Position
within the logical framework DPSIR
3. Target and
political pertinence
| Objective |
Contribution
to the definition and mapping of ESAs. |
| Importance
with respect to desertification |
Soil texture profoundly
affects soil drainage, water holding capacity, soil temperature,
soil erosion as well as fertility and productivity. Wind erosion
is a major problem when sandy soils are used for crop production
in regions with dry seasons. Wind erosion is accelerated when
the vegetative cover is removed. Clay holds more water available
for plant growth than sandy soils and the presence of water
considerably modifies the heat requirements of the soil. Temperature
of wet clay soils responds more slowly than that of sandy
soils to changes in air temperature in spring and autumn.
Clay soils have poor drainage of excess water and may become
waterlogged. Soil texture affects soil resistance to erosion.
The coarser the soil texture, the smaller the active surface
area of the soil particles, and the smaller is the resistance
of the soil to erosion. Soil texture usually changes with
soil depth but the texture of the soil surface horizon is
considered as most important.
Soil texture has a major
influence on the form, stability and resiliency of soil structure.
As the clay content increases the characteristics of the soil
matrix (including stability and form) are increasingly dominated
by the characteristics of clay, the nature and quantities
of cementing materials.
Soil crusting is affected
by several factors including soil texture. Differential swelling
breakdown increases as clay content increases, while slaking
decreases as clay contents increase favouring crusting. Mineralogy
of the soil clay plays an important role in crust formation.
Soils containing high amount of silt, such as those formed
on marl deposits, are sensitive to crust formation generating
high surface water runoff and sediment loss.
|
| International
Conventions and agreements |
The CCD emphasizes
that combating desertification must be tackled within the general
framework of actions to promote sustainable development.
|
| Secondary objectives
of the indicator |
Within the
ESA model investigation of the individual processes linked to
land degradation and desertification. |
4. Methodological
description and basic definitions
| Definitions
and basic concepts |
Soils are classified according
to their texture in classes, and each textural class have
a given range of sand, silt and clay. For practical value
in agriculture 12 classes were designated: Sand (S), loamy
sand (LS), sandy loam (SL), loam, (L), silt loam (SiL), silt
(Si), clay loam (CL), sandy clay loam (SCL), silty clay loam
(SiCL), clay (C), silty clay (SiC), and sandy clay (SC). There
are small but generally unimportant variations in soil properties
within each class and significant differences between classes.
The texture is expressed with the use of class name. Four
broad groups of classes are recognized: Sands, Silts, Clays
and Loams. Sands contain at least 80% sand particles and 15%
or less clay particles by weight. Silts contain at least 80%
silt and 12% clay particles, respectively. Clays contain at
least 35% of clay particles. Loams are mixtures of sand, silt
and clay particles that exhibit the properties of those particles
in equal proportions. Loam soils have the best combination
of physical and chemical properties in terms of cultivation
and crop growth.
 |
The
USDA textural triangle showing the limits of sand, silt
and clay contents of the various textural classes. |
|
| Benchmarks
Indication of the values/ranges of value |
- L, SCL, SL, LS, CL
- SC, SiL, SiCL
- Si, C, SiC
- S
|
| Methods of
measurement |
Field method
through the feel of a moist soil moulded between fingers and
thumb. The soil texture by this method is found in a qualitative
way. The standard analysis of sand, silt and clay content involves
dispersion of mineral particles after destroying the organic
matter. The size classes for sand are separated using sieves
and the silt and clay classes by sedimentation. Finally the
mass in each particle class is determined. |
| Limits of the
indicator |
Soil texture
can vary considerably within small distances, especially in
areas where soils have been formed on alluvial parent materials
(river deposits). In such cases the dominant textural class
is used. |
| Linkages
with other indicators |
Parent
material, Drainage, Slope
gradient, Land use type,
Vegetation cover |
5. Evaluation
of data needs and availability
| Data required
to calculate the indicator |
Weight proportions
of sand, silt and clay in a given soil sample.
|
| Data sources |
Necessary data
are usually available and accessible in regular soil survey
reports and the cost/benefit ratio is reasonable. |
| Availability
of data from national and international sources |
Data can be
obtained from various regional, national or international institutions
involved in collecting and elaborating such data. |
6. Institutions
that have participated in developing the indicator
| Main institutions
responsible |
Agricultural
University of Athens
|
| Other contributing
organizations |
Universities
of Lisbon, Murcia, Basilicata, Amsterdam, Leeds |
7. Additional
information
| Bibliography
|
Kosmas, C.,
Kirkby, M. and Geeson, N. 1999. Manual on: Key indicators of
desertification and mapping environmentally sensitive areas
to desertification. European Commission, Energy, Environment
and Sustainable Development, EUR 18882, 87 p. |
| Other references |
Zachar D., 1982. Soil
erosion :Developments in soil science 10. Elsevier Scientific
Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 547 pp.
Sumner M., Handbook of
soil science. CRC Press, New York
|
| Contacts
Name and address |
Agricultural University
of Athens, Laboratory of Soils and Agricultural Chemistry,
Iera Odos 75, Athens 11855, Greece
Dr Constantinos Kosmas
email: lsos2kok@aua.gr
|
|