DIS4ME DIS4ME Homepage | DESERTLINKS Homepage | © DESERTLINKS 2004
English-EN | Español-ES | Italiano-I | Ελληνικά-GR | Portuguese-PT
Desertification Indicator System for Mediterranean Europe


1. Definition

Name TERRACES (PRESENCE OF)
Brief definition

Terraces are constructions built mainly in hilly areas to reduce water erosion losses from cultivated erodible soils and for water conservation.

Hilly area cultivated with olive groves which has been terraced for erosion protection and water conservation. (photo by C. Kosmas)
Unit of measure Percentage of an area covered with terraces.
Spatial scale local
Temporal scale annual

2. Position within the logical framework DPSIR

Type of Indicator Response

3. Target and political pertinence

Objective Contribution to the measures to combat desertification.
Importance with respect to desertification Terracing of hilly areas is a measure to combat desertification. Adsorption of water by the soil increases during heavy rainfall events and soil erosion is reduced. If they are well designed, terraces control sheet and gully erosion by reducing slope length. Water runoff from the upper side of the terraced interval is held within the terrace, infiltrates and is stored in the soil.
International Conventions and agreements The UNCCD emphasizes that in order to combat desertification, it must be tackled within the general framework of actions that promote sustainable development.
Secondary objectives of the indicator Evaluation of the best management practices in combating desertification.

4. Methodological description and basic definitions

Definitions and basic concepts

Two major types of terraces can be distinguished. Bench terraces reduce land slope and the broadbase terraces remove or retain water on sloping land. The bench terraces are constructed by laying out strips across the slope and carrying soil from the uphill side so that level steps or benches are formed. Where, because of erosion, soil is shallow, stones are gathered and walls built across the slope, or crescent-shaped to provude roothold for individual olives, chestnuts or fruit trees. Soil usually is transferred from nearby to fill the area above the stone wall. Such terraces have been built in the past in extensive hilly areas in Europe.

The broadbase terraces may be constructed with no grade (level) or with a slope (graded) in a channel in order to intercept runoff and direct it to a protected outlet. The level terraces are primarily designed for soil water storage where rainfall is limited. The graded terraces are mainly used for minimizing erosion by reducing slope length.

In recent decades, the value of such terraces has markedly decline due to: (a) difficulties associated with accessibility and use of machineries, (b) decreasing product price and increasing labor cost for repairs, and (c) abandonment of hilly areas due to lower productivity. Collapse of terraces results in wash out of the protected soil and the rate of land degradation is very high.

The stability of stone-walled terraces is mainly related to the slope gradient, soil type, stone composition and management practice. Stones used for terrace construction present various rates of weathering and disintegration and therefore the rate of collapse is related to the parent rock from which stones are extracted. The terraces constructed by stones derived from igneous rocks, sandstones, shale or schist have usually higher rate of collapse than terraces built with stones derived from limestone or marble.

The coefficient of linear extensibility (swelling-shrinking) of the soil used for filling the terrace greatly affects stone wall stability. If soil extensibility is high, the horizontal pressure after wetting is high especially at the base of the terrace causing inflation, instability, and finally collapse. For example, soils formed in marl and ultrabasic rocks have usually higher coefficient of linear extensibility than soils formed in shale, sandstones, acid igneous rocks greatly affecting terrace stability.

Average coefficient of linear extensibility measured in soils formed in various parent materials in the island of Lesvos (source: C. Kosmas).

Slope gradient greatly affects terrace structure stability. Studies in the island of Lesvos have shown that three critical slope classes can be distinguished: (a) lower than 15%, (b) 15-35% and (c) greater than 35%. Terraces constructed in slopes lower than 15% usually remain undisturbed under certain management practices. The rate of collapse increase almost linearly with increasing slope gradient from 15% to 35%. The rate of collapse expected is very high in slopes greater than 35%. Trampling of animals over a terraced land favours terrace collapse and soil erosion.

Relation of terrace stability and slope gradient measured along transects in hilly areas of Lesvos (source C. Kosmas).
Benchmarks Indication of the values/ranges of value

Terraced area as a percentage of total area.

  • <20%,
  • 20-50%,
  • 50-75%,
  • >75%
Methods of measurement The assessment of land terracing is determined by the extent in which an area is covered by terraces. It is defined as the ratio of the area protected to the total area, expressed as a percentage. It can be measured by: (a) simple field observations, or (b) aerial photographs interpretation.
Limits of the indicator This indicator can be assessed quantitatively without subjecting to personal judgment.
Linkages with other indicators Slope gradient, Parent material, Soil depth, Soil texture, Rock fragments, Tillage operations, Land use type, Vegetation cover, Water availability, Land use intensity, Mechanization index, Policy enforcement

5. Evaluation of data needs and availability

Data required to calculate the indicator Ratio of the terraced land over the total area of interest.
Data sources Necessary data are usually available and accessible and the cost/benefit ratio is reasonable.
Availability of data from national and international sources Data can be obtained from various regional institutions involved in collecting and elaborating land management practices data.

6. Institutions that have participated in developing the indicator

Main institutions responsible Agricultural University of Athens.
Other contributing organizations Universities of Lisbon, Murcia, Basilicata.

7. Additional information

Bibliography Grove, A.T., and Rackham, O. 2001. The nature of Mediterranean Europe, an ecological history. Yale University Press, London, 107-149 pp.
Other references

Troeh, H.R., Hobbs, J. A., and Donahue, R. L. 1980. Soil and water conservation for productivity and environmental protection. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Emglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 320-394 pp.

Spencer J. E. and Hale G. A. 1961. The origin nature and distribution of agricultural terracing, Pacific Viewpoint I, 1-40 p.

Contacts Name and address Agricultural University of Athens
Dr Constantinos Kosmas
email: lsos2kok@aua.gr