|
1. Definition
| Name |
TERRACES
(PRESENCE OF) |
| Brief
definition |
Terraces are constructions
built mainly in hilly areas to reduce water erosion losses
from cultivated erodible soils and for water conservation.
_1_small.jpg) |
Hilly
area cultivated with olive groves which has been terraced
for erosion protection and water conservation. (photo
by C. Kosmas) |
|
| Unit of measure |
Percentage
of an area covered with terraces. |
| Spatial scale |
local |
| Temporal scale |
annual |
2. Position
within the logical framework DPSIR
| Type of Indicator |
Response |
3. Target and
political pertinence
| Objective |
Contribution
to the measures to combat desertification. |
| Importance
with respect to desertification |
Terracing of
hilly areas is a measure to combat desertification. Adsorption
of water by the soil increases during heavy rainfall events
and soil erosion is reduced. If they are well designed, terraces
control sheet and gully erosion by reducing slope length. Water
runoff from the upper side of the terraced interval is held
within the terrace, infiltrates and is stored in the soil. |
| International
Conventions and agreements |
The UNCCD emphasizes
that in order to combat desertification, it must be tackled
within the general framework of actions that promote sustainable
development. |
| Secondary objectives
of the indicator |
Evaluation
of the best management practices in combating desertification. |
4. Methodological
description and basic definitions
| Definitions
and basic concepts |
Two major types of terraces
can be distinguished. Bench terraces reduce land slope and
the broadbase terraces remove or retain water on sloping land.
The bench terraces are constructed by laying out strips across
the slope and carrying soil from the uphill side so that level
steps or benches are formed. Where, because of erosion, soil
is shallow, stones are gathered and walls built across the
slope, or crescent-shaped to provude roothold for individual
olives, chestnuts or fruit trees. Soil usually is transferred
from nearby to fill the area above the stone wall. Such terraces
have been built in the past in extensive hilly areas in Europe.
The broadbase terraces
may be constructed with no grade (level) or with a slope (graded)
in a channel in order to intercept runoff and direct it to
a protected outlet. The level terraces are primarily designed
for soil water storage where rainfall is limited. The graded
terraces are mainly used for minimizing erosion by reducing
slope length.
In recent decades, the
value of such terraces has markedly decline due to: (a) difficulties
associated with accessibility and use of machineries, (b)
decreasing product price and increasing labor cost for repairs,
and (c) abandonment of hilly areas due to lower productivity.
Collapse of terraces results in wash out of the protected
soil and the rate of land degradation is very high.
The stability of stone-walled
terraces is mainly related to the slope gradient, soil type,
stone composition and management practice. Stones used for
terrace construction present various rates of weathering and
disintegration and therefore the rate of collapse is related
to the parent rock from which stones are extracted. The terraces
constructed by stones derived from igneous rocks, sandstones,
shale or schist have usually higher rate of collapse than
terraces built with stones derived from limestone or marble.
The coefficient of linear
extensibility (swelling-shrinking) of the soil used for filling
the terrace greatly affects stone wall stability. If soil
extensibility is high, the horizontal pressure after wetting
is high especially at the base of the terrace causing inflation,
instability, and finally collapse. For example, soils formed
in marl and ultrabasic rocks have usually higher coefficient
of linear extensibility than soils formed in shale, sandstones,
acid igneous rocks greatly affecting terrace stability.
_2_small.jpg) |
Average
coefficient of linear extensibility measured in soils
formed in various parent materials in the island of Lesvos
(source: C. Kosmas). |
Slope gradient greatly
affects terrace structure stability. Studies in the island
of Lesvos have shown that three critical slope classes can
be distinguished: (a) lower than 15%, (b) 15-35% and (c) greater
than 35%. Terraces constructed in slopes lower than 15% usually
remain undisturbed under certain management practices. The
rate of collapse increase almost linearly with increasing
slope gradient from 15% to 35%. The rate of collapse expected
is very high in slopes greater than 35%. Trampling of animals
over a terraced land favours terrace collapse and soil erosion.
_3.jpg) |
Relation
of terrace stability and slope gradient measured along
transects in hilly areas of Lesvos (source C. Kosmas).
|
|
| Benchmarks
Indication of the values/ranges of value |
Terraced area as a percentage
of total area.
- <20%,
- 20-50%,
- 50-75%,
- >75%
|
| Methods of
measurement |
The assessment
of land terracing is determined by the extent in which an area
is covered by terraces. It is defined as the ratio of the area
protected to the total area, expressed as a percentage. It can
be measured by: (a) simple field observations, or (b) aerial
photographs interpretation. |
| Limits of the
indicator |
This indicator
can be assessed quantitatively without subjecting to personal
judgment. |
| Linkages with
other indicators |
Slope
gradient, Parent material,
Soil depth, Soil
texture, Rock fragments,
Tillage operations, Land
use type, Vegetation cover,
Water availability, Land
use intensity, Mechanization
index, Policy enforcement |
5. Evaluation
of data needs and availability
| Data required
to calculate the indicator |
Ratio of the
terraced land over the total area of interest. |
| Data sources |
Necessary data
are usually available and accessible and the cost/benefit ratio
is reasonable. |
| Availability
of data from national and international sources |
Data can be
obtained from various regional institutions involved in collecting
and elaborating land management practices data. |
6. Institutions
that have participated in developing the indicator
| Main institutions
responsible |
Agricultural
University of Athens. |
| Other contributing
organizations |
Universities
of Lisbon, Murcia, Basilicata. |
7. Additional
information
| Bibliography
|
Grove, A.T.,
and Rackham, O. 2001. The nature of Mediterranean Europe, an
ecological history. Yale University Press, London, 107-149 pp.
|
| Other references |
Troeh, H.R., Hobbs, J.
A., and Donahue, R. L. 1980. Soil and water conservation for
productivity and environmental protection. Prentice-Hall,
Inc., Emglewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 320-394 pp.
Spencer J. E. and Hale
G. A. 1961. The origin nature and distribution of agricultural
terracing, Pacific Viewpoint I, 1-40 p.
|
| Contacts Name
and address |
Agricultural
University of Athens
Dr Constantinos Kosmas
email: lsos2kok@aua.gr |
|