|
1. Definition
| Name |
VEGETATION
QUALITY INDEX |
| Brief definition |
This index
is calculated using classifications of the following parameters:
fire risk, erosion protection, drought resistance, and plant
cover. |
| Unit of measure |
VQI = (fire
risk*erosion protection*drought resistance*vegetation cover)**1/4 |
| Spatial scale |
Regional |
| Temporal
scale |
|
2. Position
within the logical framework DPSIR
3. Target and
political pertinence
| Objective |
To condense
knowledge about vegetation properties into an index that can
be used on it's own or in conjunction with other quality indexes
associated with desertification. |
| Importance
with respect to desertification |
Vegetation
cover is crucial for controlling run-off generation, and on
hilly areas of the Mediterranean is dependent on climatic conditions
and the season of the year. |
| International
Conventions and agreements |
A variety of
transboundary legislation exists, as well as EC directives.
|
| Secondary
objectives of the indicator |
To
contribute to an overall measure of sensitivity to desertification
in the classification of Environmentally Sensitive Areas, and
ESI. |
4. Methodological
description and basic definitions
| Definitions
and basic concepts |
Vegetation quality is
assessed in terms of a) fire risk and ability to recover,
b) erosion protection for the soil, c) drought resistance
and d) plant cover. The dominant types of vegetation in the
Mediterranean region (including bare land, perennial agricultural
crops, annual agricultural crops, deciduous oak woodland,
macchia, evergreen forests, and pine forests) are grouped
into four categories according to fire risk. There are also
four categories of vegetation according to degree of soil
erosion protection, from annual agricultural crops (very low)
to mixed macchia/evergreen forests (high). Five categories
are used to classify vegetation with respect to drought resistance,
and there are three categories of plant cover.
Fires have become very
frequent, especially in pine-dominated forests with dramatic
consequences for increased soil erosion rates and biodiversity
losses. Many Mediterranean species are highly flammable and
combustible due to a high content of resins and oils. It is
possible for all the species of a mature ecosystem to regenerate
during the first year following a fire, as they tend to be
well-adapted to surviving fire, but drought, grazing by livestock
or other land use changes may interrupt the process irreversibly.
The two main strategies for species survival in a fire-prone
ecosystem are re-sprouting from underground parts and germination
of buried seeds.
Vegetation and land use
are important factors controlling the intensity and frequency
of overland flow and surface wash erosion. In particular,
areas cultivated with rain-fed crops such as cereals. vines,
almonds and olives, where the soil surface is left bare for
much of the year, are very vulnerable to erosion and desertification.
Trends in Mediterranean agriculture to maintain a vegetation
cover, and use minimum tillage and direct seeding techniques
will help to avoid increasing soil erosion.
There are two groups of
vegetation well-adapted to drought resistance. One group are
deciduous and avoid drought with a large photosynthetic capacity
but no resistance to desiccation. The other group are evergreen
(sclerophyllous) and drought enduring with low rates of photosysnthesis.
The main response of plants to increased aridity is reduction
in leaf area index. In the short term this reduces plant transpiration,
but if the vegetation cover is reduced the likelihood of soil
erosion is increased when rain eventually falls. Olive trees
exhibit a high adaptation and resistance to long term droughts
and can support a remarkably high diversity of flora and fauna
in the understorey.
Many authors have demonstrated
that in a wide range of environments both run-off and sediment
loss decrease exponentially as the percentage of vegetation
cover increases. A value of 40% vegetation cover is considered
critical, below which accelerated erosion dominates in a sloping
landscape. This threshold my be modified for different types
of vegetation, rain intensity and land attributes.
|
| Benchmarks
Indication of the values/ranges of value |
According to
the class of each vegetation quality indicator (fire risk, erosion
protection, drought resistance, and plant cover) a numerical
value is assigned. The geometric mean of the four vegetation
quality indicators is calculated. Three classes of Vegetaion
Quality Index are then distinguished: high quality, moderate
quality, and low quality. For ranges of weighting indices see
Kosmas, Kirkby and Geeson, 1999. |
| Methods of
measurement |
Vegetation Quality Index
= (fire risk*erosion protection*drought resistance*vegetation
cover)**1/4.
For the components of
this calculation, four classes of fire risk, four classes
of erosion protection, five classes of drought resistance
and three classes of plant cover must be assessed.
|
| Limits of the
indicator |
The Vegetation
quality index has been developed particularly for the Greek
island of Lesvos, and the weighting indices may require adjustment
for other areas. |
| Linkages with
other indicators |
Fire
risk, Erosion protection,
Drought resistance, Vegetation
cover, Climate quality
index, Soil quality index,
Management quality index,
ESI. |
5. Evaluation
of data needs and availability
| Data required
to calculate the indicator |
Data are required
relating to four classes of fire risk, four classes of erosion
protection, five classes of drought resistance and three classes
of plant cover. |
| Data sources |
Basic vegetation
or land use information is usually available in a cost-effective
format. |
| Availability
of data from national and international sources |
Data
can be obtained from national agencies and various regional
institutions involved in collecting and processing data. |
6. Institutions
that have participated in developing the indicator
| Main institutions
responsible |
Agricultural
University of Athens, Greece |
| Other
contributing organizations |
Universities
of Lisbon, Murcia, Basilicata |
7. Additional
information
| Bibliography
|
Kosmas,
C., Kirkby, M. and Geeson, N. 1999. Manual on: Key indicators
of desertification and mapping environmentally sensitive areas
to desertification. European Commission, Energy, Environment
and Sustainable Development, EUR 18882, 87 p. |
| Other references |
Brandt, J., and Thornes,
J., 1996 Mediterranean Desertification and Land Use. J. Wiley
& Sons, Chichester, England, 554.
Kosmas C., Ferrara A.,
Gerontidis, St. Bellotti B., Detsis V., Faretta S., Mancino
G., and Pisante, M. 1999. A comparative analysis of the physical
environment of two Mediterranean areas threatened by desertifciation.
Mediterraneo M. 127-148.
Conacher, A., and Sala,
M., 1998. Land Degradation in the Mediterranean Environments
of the World: Nature and Extent, Causes and Solutions. J.
Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 491 p.
|
| Contacts Name
and address |
Dr. Constantinos
Kosmas
Agricultural University of Athens, Greece
email: lsos2kok@aua.gr |
|