DIS4ME DIS4ME Homepage | DESERTLINKS Homepage | © DESERTLINKS 2004
English-EN | Español-ES | Italiano-I | Ελληνικά-GR | Portuguese-PT
Desertification Indicator System for Mediterranean Europe


Indicators and NAPs

Return to the introduction


Spain
Author: Leopoldo Rojo Serrano <lrojo@mma.es>


The dramatic erosion of terraced land that has been abandoned from agriculture, Cieza, Spain (photo by F. López-Bermúdez)

Here the Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, the focal point of the National Committee to Combat Desertification in Spain sets out the method employed to obtain a first determination of the areas affected by desertification in the Spanish territory. Then the process is described whereby a desertification indicator system for Spain was developed.

g Objectives of National Action Programme
g Identification of areas affected by desertification in Spain
g Development of a desertification indicator system for Spain
  g Background
  g Purpose and scope of indicator system
  g The approach
  g Pre-requisites as boundary conditions for indicator system requirements

g Objectives of National Action Programme

Objectives Actions Proposed Indicators used

1. To contribute to the sustainable development of the arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas by the prevention or reduction of land degradation, the rehabilitation of partly degraded land and the recovery of desertified land.
2. The identification of the main factors and mechanisms of desertification in Spain and the definition of the practical measures to combat desertification.
3. The integration in the National Policy of Sustainable Development.
4. Promotion of the institutional co-ordination and the development and design of the policies needed for the various sector-oriented action plans.
5. Definition of the Programme's role as a catalyst of the measures related to Desertification control.
6. Promotion of the participatory process of all the involved sectors of society.

1. Fostering of sustainable agricultural practices for soil conservation.
2. Management of the extensive cattle-raising in the arid and semiarid areas.
3. Fostering of sustainable management of the forests.
4. Basins management and restoration in arid and semi-arid degraded areas.
5. Prevention and combat of forest fires.
6. Sustainable management of the water resources, particularly with measures focused to the efficiency and saving of water, as well as the prevention and mitigation of the aquifers overexplotation and soil salinization.
7. Assessment and monitoring of the desertification.
8. Analysis, dissemination and usage of the results of the programmes of I+D+I on desertification. Promotion of Projects and Surveys.
9. Incorporation of the social sectors affected by NAP development.
10. Net of demonstrative Projects of restoration and sustainable management.

1. Aridity index.
2. Soil Loss Index (USLE).
3. Percentage of the accumulated surface area affected by fire over a 10 year period.
4. Damage caused to forests by drought.
5. The existence of over-exploited aquifers.

Source: Working document of the Spanish National Action Programme to Combat Desertification, 2003. Source: Working document of the Spanish National Action Programme to Combat Desertification, 2003. Source: DISMED Technical Workshop on NAP information needs. Spanish NCB report. DISMED-florence-spain-NCB.rtf

5 top

g Identification of the areas affected by desertification in Spain

The objective is to identify physical and socio-economic areas which are affected in which to focus actions to combat desertification.

As a first approximation, a simple model has been applied based on the characterisation of hydrological sub basins paying attention to indicators which reflect the intensity with which factors and processes determining desertification occur. Using this model a map of sub-basins showing the degree to which they are affected by desertification has been produced.

Territorial working units. Spain was divided into 340 hydrographic sub-basins the advantage being that this working unit has also been employed as a physico-biological and socio-economico-political unit for planning and arranging natural resources.

For each sub-basin the intensity of four factors and processes which determine desertification was determined. These were aridity, erosion, fire and non-sustainable use of water resources, specifically the over-exploitation of aquifers. The combination of these four factors gives a first approximation of how affected each sub-basin is by desertification.

Aridity. In accordance with the definition of desertification by the UNCCD, the sub-basins included in the arid, semi-arid and dry sub-humid areas have been characterised. These are those in which the ratio between annual rainfall and potential evapotranspiration is between 0.05 and 0.65. In the context of the Convention it is considered that, because of their climatic conditions, humid and sub-humid zones are not affected by desertification.

Erosive state. For the whole of Spain, there are maps showing the erosive state. From these maps the median soil loss, expressed in t/ha/year has been obtained for each sub-basin.

Fire intensity. A map of fire intensity, measured as a percentage of cumulated surface affected by fire over a 10 year period was used to characterise forest fires for each sub-basin. Intensity was classified into four groups according to the following range of values >25%, 10-25%, 1-10%, <1%.

Aquifer overexploitation. Finally, with regard to non-sustainable use of water resources the state of exploitation of aquifers was used as an indicator (source Libro Blanco de las Aguas Subterráneas) classified according to the following range of values (where e is extraction of groundwater and R is recharge by infiltration): E>R; R>E>0.8R; local overexploitation problems; no problems.


Combining factors. For each sub-basin the four factors were combined, in order to obtain a map showing a first approximation of the degree of desertification. Numerical values were assigned to each of the classes as shown in the table. From this it can be seen that the heaviest weighting was given to erosion which encompasses various factors like erosivity of the rain, slope gradient, type and density of vegetation cover and the susceptibility to erosion of the parent material. Also it was considered that aridity had a heavier weight than fire intensity and over-exploitation of aquifers.

Degree to which areas are affected. The sum of each of the numerical values characterising each sub-basin is shown in the table in which the values have been grouped into four categories of degree to which they are affected, very high, high, medium and low.

Map of desertification-affected sub-basins. This is the map which combines the information for the four factors and which shows those sub-basins which have been most affected by desertification.

 

Number of desertification-affected sub-basins. Following the application of this model, it can be seen that 31.49% of the Spanish territory is either very highly or highly affected by desertification. This indicates the magnitude of the problem that confronts us.

5 top

g Development of a desertification indicator system for Spain

g Background

Indicator potentialities: UNCCD

  • Assessment and mapping of desertification
  • Identification of causes of desertification
  • Impact assessment
  • Justification of mitigation measures
  • Monitoring of efficiency of desertification measures

Indicator potentialities: Spanish NAP

  • Identification of sensitive and affected areas
  • Monitoring the efficiency of preventive and mitigation measures

Existence of diverse approaches to environmental indicators:

  • OECD
  • CSD
  • EEA
  • Spanish Ministry of Environment (Spanish System of Environmental Indicators)
  • inter alia

5 top

g Purpose and scope

To identify and apply a set of indicators to meet the STATED NEEDS at national and international level, integrated in the existing Spanish System of Environmental Indicators.

Existing contributions are numerous and relevant. Rather than contribute more indicators it is better to profit from the existing ones. The approach taken has been the gathering, selection and systematisation of existing indicators directly applicable to desertification or their connected sectors (sustainable development, integrated agriculture, sustainable forestry, water management). The focus is placed on Spanish biophysical, social and economic activity.

The final objective is to provide the interested users at the different levels (national, sub-national and local) with a tool box which allows flexible use adaptable to their interests and data availability.

5 top

g The approach

Information gathering to describe the state of the art

International sources - organisations

  • United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development: Sustainable development indicators.
  • Mediterranean Commission of Sustainable Development: Indicators for the Sustainable Development in the Mediterranean.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Environmental indicators.
  • EEA (European Environment Agency): Environmental Indicators.
  • Eurostat. Statistical Office of the European Communities: Pressure Indicators.
  • European Commision: environmental indicators.
  • EEA (European Environment Agency): Soil Indicators.
  • European Commision: Agri-environmental indicators.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Agri-environmental indicators.
  • FAO/PNUD/PNUMA/World Bank: Initiative for Earth Quality Indicators.
  • UNCCD: United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification.

International sources - projects

  • MEDALUS: Research works over desertification in Southern Europe.
  • MEDRAP: Works and surveys to support the RAP.
  • DISMED: Information system to support the NAPs of the Mediterranean countries.
  • DESERTLINKS: Indicators of desertification for the Mediterranean Europe.
  • LADA: Indicators of land degradation.

National sources

  • CRITERIOS E INDICADORES PANEUROPEOS PARA UNA GESTIÓN SOSTENIBLE DE LOS BOSQUES: Desarrollo en España en el Inventario Forestal Nacional y en el marco del Plan Forestal Español.
  • ESTRATEGIA ESPAÑOLA DE DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE: Indicadores de sostenibilidad.
  • SISTEMA ESPAÑOL DE INDICADORES AMBIENTALES: Tronco Nacional de Indicadores Ambientales.
  • PLAN NACIONAL DE REGADÍOS (PNR): Indicadores agro-ambientales para el Plan de Vigilancia Ambiental del PNR.

Indicator selection and systematization

Previous definition of fundamental concepts - indicator, parameter, index

Classification features: i) grouping according to the indicated concept, ii) multiple classification criteria - this provides the set of indicators with multifunctionality consistent with the tool bos and open system approach adopted.

The selected indicators were classified into groups according to their

  • functional similarity;
  • biological, economic, social or institutional nature;

to their position in the

  • D, P, S, I, R framework
  • sectorial framework (agriculture, forestry, water resources)
  • ecosystem framework (water, soil, biotic);

to their spatial reference

  • national, regional, local;

to certain ecological land units or desertification landscapes as related to the National Action Programme

Woody crops affected by erosion

Irrigated land
Extensive rain-fed crops affected by erosion
Degraded uncultivated and scrub-land
Overgrazed rangelands

and to other information including

  • typology of the indicator (environmental, pan European, soil, sustainability, etc)
  • Organisation/project source of the indicator
  • dimensions of the indicator, if any (e.g. cm, percentage)
  • whether or not a fact sheet or description of the indicator exists.

From existing indicator descriptions or fact sheets the indicators related to each concept have been described. The basic methodology is the following: out from the gathered previous facts sheets, it is selected the relevant data and information in accordance with the Spanish national situation and necessities. The result is a collection of "New Fact Sheets" structured not by the singular indicator, but by the general concept. From existing indicator descriptions or fact sheets the indicators related to each concept have been described.

These new fact sheets are in three parts. (1) Concept: the concept is defined and a concise explanation is given of its relevance to desertification. (2) Indicators: each indicator that is part of the group is explained briefly and other sources of information are given. (3) Interpretation and evaluation of data: the data and identified needs are evaluated and interpreted.

Examples of application at different scales

The features of the system are:

  • tool box
  • custom made
  • multifunctional
  • open / adaptable to every case and condition

Applications examples are available at these scales

  • National
  • Sub-national (Guadalentin)
  • Local/farm/project

5 top

g Pre-requisites as boundary conditions for indicator system requirements

Selection and filtering of indicators according to their

  • conceptual informative value
  • informative value
  • availability (homogeneity)
  • interrelations

Methodological treatment for understanding and exploitation

  • simple
  • intuitive
  • conceptually based

Consistency

  • objectives (needs)
  • themes
  • complexity
  • scale

Desertification is a dynamic phenomenon. Therefore data should be used from two different time periods. Changes in data over time will show how desertification landscapes evolved. The following diagram shows a theoretical scheme for dynamic indicators of desertification.

5 top